Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kobali[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another apparent GNS-copying failure. Recorded only as a "populated place" which on GNS is specifically a level below village or town and implies no legal recognition (necessary for WP:GEOLAND). I have not been able to locate any non-GNS sources that provide any indication that this is a legally-recognized town, nor any that discuss it in any detail. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
comment I've fixed the coordinates, which had a sign error in the longitude which places the spot in Nigeria. Mangoe (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete I couldn't find anything besides clickbait. There is a tiny settlement just east of the GNS spot, but is this it? Mangoe (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.